WHY IT MATTERS
64%
of software defects originate during requirements analysis (Deloitte)
40%
of project budget lost to rework from vague requirements
60%
budget overrun on projects with poor requirements
100x
more expensive to fix bad requirements later in development
Meanwhile KPI definitions live in scattered spreadsheets, clarification meetings fill calendars, and the same metric gets built twice with two different answers. We fix that at the source.


Higher quality
Completeness scores assess real progress at every stage of planning. No extra meetings.
Evaluate. Improve. Sustain.


2. Governance Setup · 6 to 8 weeks, platform included
Standardization, approval model and a de-duplicated KPI registry, wired into Jira or Azure DevOps.
3. Managed Requirements Practice · ongoing
Guidance when you need it, scheduled quality reviews and KPI stewardship as new teams join.
1. Requirements Health Check · 2 weeks, fixed fee
We ingest your backlog, score every item, name duplicate and conflicting KPIs, and hand you a prioritised 90-day plan.
Going from needing something, to having it done.


Every new KPI and request is compared against your whole catalog, and owners record which definition stands and why.
A data catalog tells you what exists. A ticket tool records what someone asked for. ReQu runs the process between them: open questions get owners, approvals route around absences, and every request ends dev-ready in Jira or Azure DevOps.


Built for the governance review
Metadata, not data
ReQu reads catalog metadata. It never touches your data unless you grant it.
Append-only audit log
Every change to every record, with who made it and when.
AI on your terms
A per-organisation policy decides which AI endpoints may be used, enforced at send time.
Single sign-on
SSO for your identity provider, with roles per line of business.
Start with a two-week Health Check.
See your backlog scored, your duplicate metrics named, and a plan your team can act on, before you commit to anything larger.




